3:04 AM

Brand Bihar shines against odds

October 27, 2010

When a prominent journalist made a faux pas on Bihar being a liability on tax payers’ money and Brand Bihar ignoring it, he was made to eat his own words by the strong reaction of the well placed Bihari community across the country. Prima Facie what seemed to be the new age technology and networking sites like Facebook giving a voice to the pride of the otherwise detached class of Bihar, had something more than that. A very close follower of the diaspora of Bihar and their sensibilities, it was heartening to see the emergence of “Brand Bihar” in true letter and spirit.
Had the resurgence of Bihar as a truly power centre of India been only for the academic purposes, the diaspora of the state would not have erupted with such a strong reaction. But the voice of the Non Residents Biharis (NRB), who may not have any plans of resettling in home state, was as curt as the residents of Bihar. This is a clear indicator of the fact that the resurgence of Bihar has come of age. 
 The economics of “Brand Bihar” is not the only indicator of the hidden potential of the state. Of course, the GDP rate of 11% at a time when the world economy was reeling under recession and even the national economy slumped to around 6% will always remain a matter of pride for a community that has been at the receiving end of reverse racism in its own country for nearly three decades.
However, what gives me a sense of satisfaction is that the economics of “Brand Bihar” has been equally supported by the sociology of emotional pride for the state. A History Graduate in me clearly understands that the civilizations turn into Great & Role Model for future only when the economics and sociology of the land and its people are inter-linked. I have time and again raised my voice at various forum that what is missing link in harnessing the true potential of the state of Bihar is the sociology, and not economics.
The unfortunate reality thus far has been this lack of emotional chord. There are two reasons responsible for relegating the Bihari identity into dustbin. I may be rubbing some of my own brethren the wrong way here, but it is high time that we look into the deep rooted malaise, if Brand Bihar has to be positioned like never before. Let’s face the facts bluntly. The curse of caste has been the bane of Bihar, as deep rooted in polity as in society. But the rising economy & high aspiration level is certainly reducing the caste divide. A strong focus on “Bihar Pride” will further cement the gaps.
Our own acceptance of fate as second class citizens in exchange of a decent living is something that the migrant Biharis had to live with. The poor projection of the state at various human development indicators led the collective consciousness to shape up against the residents of Bihar. An average working class somehow started learning to live with this crude reality of being under the social scrutiny for no fault of theirs. The strengths of the state of Bihar was not even allowed to be discussed in public for quite some time.
The wheels of fortune turned in the last few years when the state started showing signs of development and improved ranking of state on human development indicators. A catalyst to this undercurrent has been the fact that the thinly spread vocal working class with relatively better consciousness of their rights and pride started networking. Even though such networking has mostly been on the sites like Facebook, it subconsciously gives every other Bihari that he is not alone and can’t be cornered.
The moot point here is whether this emergence of Brand Bihar has been accepted beyond Bihar. It is here that I find graceful acceptance of this social reality few and far between. I can say with my own experience in Delhi that the people, who accepted us as one among equals, only accepted the elite class in us while their subconscious mind always gave them pseudo assurance of being more than equal and added superiority complex. 
While reservations against the state have always been borne out of perception, the rise of Brand Bihar has not diminished it. It has actually further intensified among a larger section who see the state as a threat to their own existence. The detaste against Brand Bihar may not be vocal like a few years back, since calling somebody a Bihari with negative connotations is fraught with danger now even in public transport of metro cities. But the silent resentment is even more dangerous because you never know who is actually a frienemy.
It is not unusual to find people in metro cribbing that their children can’t compete in premium services like the IAS and IIT, since most of the seats are occupied by the students of Bihar. While the grudge to not competing in this meritocracy has always been there, the rise of Brand Bihar has inculcated a new fear psychosis in them. It may be silent, it may be hidden…but then Vinod Dua is not the only person who thinks Bihar is a threat, can’t be competed against and hence the only option is to demoralize the state with a negative perception created around it.
I wish they could see the new power house called Brand Bihar, and get benefited by acknowledging it. Come on guys….since you can not beat us, join us. Brand Bihar invites all Indians with arms wide open. We have been doing so since ages and our academic excellence in Nalanda has been a testimony to this. 
8:14 AM

Hey Ram...Save Rama from his fanatics

October 2, 2010

Immediately after the Ayodhya verdict over Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid, a young man’s chat completely turned me off. “Sir Hindu Jeet Gaye” (Hindus have won)…This was not just a statement, rather reflected the thought process of a generation whom we expect to be progressive. I was all the more ashamed by the tenacity of this idiotic statement since it was coming from an educated person who is also a qualified lawyer. Legality of the judgment and ethics & plurality of the nation apart, the statement reflected an undercurrent of the psyche which still believes India should not move ahead of the medieval act that happened on the fateful day of Dec 6, 1992. 
While the country eagerly awaited the verdict on Ayodhya, it was heartening to see the vocal class of India pleading peace and harmony over religious bigotry. If various social networking sites were any indication, the mood of the nation seemed to be in favour of moving ahead of the controversy over temple & mosque that has seen the turnaround of India’s polity in the last two decades. However, the big question remained: Will it be the same goodwill after the verdict? After all, a win-win solution for all the parties (consciously calling them parties and not religion) seemed to be only a wishful thinking.
However, while the questionable verdict was accepted by and large by the nation with an appeal for moving ahead, stray and loose comments in-between has got alarming proportions. It is true that 2010 is not 1992, an entire generation has been exposed to a different and progressive society; there is no devilish P V Narsimha Rao, conspirator L K Advani or idiotic Kalyan Singh at the helm. But then what is more dangerous to the humanity in general and plural character of the nation in particular is the thought & ideology than the individuals.
Coming to the ethics of the dispute and legality of the judgment, I wonder had it been the other way round then whether the fanatic Hindus (who are still vocal with war cry) would have agreed for moving ahead? Moreover, if it is Hindu victory (as believed by a few educated idiots) then why the hell is Hindu Mahasabha challenging it in the apex court? I am myself a devout believer of Lord Rama and believe that he is very much part of the nature, hence exists everywhere.  After all, Sanatan Dharma and Vedic Living advocate the worship of even trees of Peepal, Banana and others. The fact of the matter is that Lord Rama’s existence and reputation is today more in danger from his own followers than the followers of other sects fighting over the Babri Masjid rights.
I am equally perplexed by the judgment which, according to me, raises more questions than answers the given dispute. Of course, the three bench judgment itself is divided and a clear answer was only a wishful thinking. However, one wonders whether the illegal demolition of the Babri Masjid has been legalized by the judgment.  What would have happened had the mosque not been demolished as yet? Had it then been a legal sanction to the demolition of a religious shrine? What about the constitutional assurance to the minorities that all the religious structures should stand the way they stood at the time of independence?
But I suppose the jurisdiction of the court was confined to the title rights over the land. Under the given circumstances, with Archaeological Survey of India findings also inconclusive, the honorable judges confined their decision over the title rights of the land only. However, the socio-political nature of the dispute demanded that the state should have intervened over the issue to not only address the issue but also set a precedent.
Had there been a timely state intervention, it would have saved Lord Rama being victimized, traumatized and de-glorified. May be a national monument on the disputed site would have done no harm to the reputation and international image of India. It would have also acted as a deterrent to the lumpen fanatics who think Ram Janmabhoomi judgment is the run-up to Krishna Janmabhoomi.    Most importantly, India would have really moved ahead in the true sense of the term.